Under consideration Edit

Article reads like an advertising blurb and will need a rewrite if it's going to stay. I'm also still undecided on whether this wiki will serve the arcade games or stick to just the Activision series. Thoughts? Ded10cTalk · Contrib's 23:35, June 23, 2015 (UTC)

I'm curious to see what a rewrite would look like, tbh. Removing all the adjectives makes for a pretty odd page; the ZOMG! exclamation points were already removed, because nothing is more annoying than every sentence ending with one. But neither here nor there, I suppose - if you guys decide not to include it on this site, please let me know.
FYI: It is also just called Battlezone. The Rebellion part of it is never mentioned in any of the press releases. Raylan13@fandom (talk) 16:48, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
We will probably include the arcade games, it's certainly a good time to. I've already acquired copies of each game (bar the XBLA title) in preparation and there are already the beginnings of Battlezone 2000 articles on my sandbox. Unfortunately since it's still just me making the decisions around here I'm slightly hesitant; the community for the late-90s games are notoriously conservative, so too much too quickly might push what little reader/editorship they provide out entirely.
This being the sixth-or-so game of that name so far we obviously can't really have the article called "Battlezone", and with the date still variable I didn't really want to use that either. Frankly with "Battlezone" being a working title even that's tentative, but we've little choice but to stick with that one.
I do so much appreciate having another editor around here, it's dreadfully quiet. I really do value your contribution, no matter how brief. Ded10cTalk · Contrib's 19:52, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.